๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง-๐ฆ๐๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ ?
- ekwithree

- Aug 8, 2025
- 1 min read
Updated: Aug 18, 2025
A closer look at how priorities differ across investor types
At ekwithree, we believe that understanding LP preferences is critical to building lasting partnerships. Our recent insights show that while all LPs care about trust and performance, what they prioritize - and how they define value - varies widely by type.
๐๐๐ฒ ๐จ๐๐ฌ๐๐ซ๐ฏ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ:
๐น๐๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ, who control the majority of LP capital, focus heavily on track record and team expertise - they care less about deal flow access or networks.
๐น๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐๐ฌย have shifted in recent years: now placing more weight on track record and often negotiating bespoke terms.
๐น๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐จ๐๐๐ข๐๐๐ฌ value network access and team expertise, and typically seek early relationship-building.
๐น๐๐๐๐๐ฌ tend to favor softer factors like integrity and โhow to win deals,โ placing less emphasis on formal track records or team credentials.
๐ Even though metrics like IRR and TVPI matter, many LPs - especially non-institutionals - look for something deeper: trust, alignment, and differentiated access.
This tells us something important: Raising capital isnโt just about performance data - itโs about knowing your audience and speaking their language.
And what do you think?



